Why would subordinates undera democratic leader perform better in the leaders absence than would subordinates under a autocratic leader?

Subordinates under a democratic leader would likely perform better in the leader's absence because they feel empowered and motivated to take ownership of their work. In contrast, subordinates under an autocratic leader may lack the initiative or confidence to perform well without direct oversight and guidance. Democratic leaders tend to foster a sense of responsibility and trust among their team, leading to increased performance and autonomy.