Why might eisenhower have been more appealing as a presidential candidate than MacArthur?

Eisenhower may have been more appealing as a presidential candidate than MacArthur due to his military leadership during World War II, which garnered widespread public admiration and trust. He presented a more moderate and unifying vision for the nation, appealing to a broader electorate, while MacArthur's often controversial and divisive stances, particularly regarding the Korean War, alienated some voters. Additionally, Eisenhower's ability to connect with everyday Americans and his focus on domestic issues made him a more relatable choice for the presidency.