Should any new religion be based on reality?

Any religion, new or ancient, should be based on reality.

It should be based on worshiping The Creator, the one who made us, and who provides the essentials for life each day.

-- But -- Since we cannot litterally SEE this Creator; and since we cannot literally HEAR this Creator - - there is naturally also going to be 'FAITH' that's involved.

This is called in a Court of Law: 'circumstantial EVIDENCE'. Such EVIDENCE is considered in making a determination; such EVIDENCE -- IS ACCEPTABLE in a Court of Law. Thus even if we don't have the 'reality' of actually 'witnessing / seeing' our Creator; nor do we have the 'reality' of 'hearing' his voice; -- we weigh the various pieces of 'circumstantial EVIDENCE' -- and thus we are in the 'arena of REALITY.'

Example: Let's say that you have a huge pile of beans (red beans, black, brown, green, yellow, purple; that's 6 colors.) Now you are given a scoop; and blind folded; and asked to drive you scooper into the pile of beans, and just come up with only 1 color, red beans; what are the mathematical chances of accomplishing such? The chances are soooooo great, that scientifically, it is considered IMPOSSIBLE. This is acceptable as PROOF, as EVIDENCE that you could NEVER do it, regardless if you Swore Under Oath in a Court of Law.