How might Russia history have been different if Czar Nicholas had allowed Duma or parliament to have a real voice in the government?

If Czar Nicholas II had granted the Duma genuine power and a real voice in government, it could have potentially mitigated widespread discontent and revolutionary fervor in early 20th-century Russia. A more cooperative relationship between the monarchy and legislative bodies might have fostered political reforms and addressed social grievances, reducing the appeal of radical movements. This could have led to a more stable political environment, possibly delaying or even preventing the 1917 Revolution and the subsequent rise of the Bolsheviks. Ultimately, a stronger parliamentary system might have altered the trajectory of Russian history, leading to a different outcome in both World War I and the shape of the Soviet Union.