Judges who adhere closely to statutes and decisions in previous cases are said to exercise judicial?

Judges who adhere closely to statutes and decisions in previous cases are said to exercise judicial restraint. This approach emphasizes the importance of following established law and precedent, ensuring consistency and predictability in legal outcomes. By limiting their own discretion, these judges aim to uphold the rule of law and respect the legislative intent behind statutes. This contrasts with judicial activism, where judges may interpret laws more broadly or adapt them to contemporary values.