Do you agree or disagree with the Supreme Courts majority ruling in Yarborough v.Alvarado?

In Yarborough v. Alvarado, the Supreme Court ruled that the police did not have to inform a minor of his right to terminate an interrogation, which upheld the notion that a reasonable person standard applies. I find this ruling concerning, as it can undermine the rights of juveniles in custodial situations, where their understanding of legal concepts and rights may be limited. The decision raises important questions about the protections afforded to vulnerable populations during police encounters. Overall, while the ruling supports law enforcement's discretion, it may inadvertently jeopardize the rights of those who may not fully grasp their situation.