Are modern cases like lopez and morrison consistent with mcculloch and gibbons?

Yes, modern cases like Lopez and Morrison reflect a more constrained interpretation of Congress's Commerce Clause powers compared to McCulloch and Gibbons, which broadly affirmed federal authority. Lopez and Morrison established limits on Congress's ability to regulate activities that are not directly related to interstate commerce, emphasizing the importance of state sovereignty and the delineation of federal powers. This shift indicates a balance between federal and state authority that contrasts with the expansive interpretations of the earlier cases.