Why is unanimous decision considered more important than a split decision?

A unanimous decision is considered more important than a split decision because it reflects a complete consensus among the judges, indicating clear and undeniable dominance by one competitor. This consensus lends greater credibility to the outcome, as all judges agree on the winner. In contrast, a split decision reveals division among the judges, suggesting that the fight was closely contested and open to interpretation, which can lead to controversy and debate over the result. Thus, unanimous decisions are seen as more definitive and authoritative in establishing a winner.