Having a system that primarily relies on statutes to solve disputes and problems would be better than one that relies on cases?

Firstly, this is not a question, this is a closed statement, if you wanted to make it a question you should have put, 'Does having a system', and in relation to that, having a system that relies on statutes would not be as beneficial as they do not relate to real life scenario's, whereas cases do, statutes are made by parliament and if we were to rely on law set by statutes as oppose to cases, we would not get the justice we were looking for as cases offer us a wider range of possibility's.