Should the mean not be reported as the primary measure of central tendency when a distribution contains a lot of deviant outcomes?

Yes, the mean should not be reported as the primary measure of central tendency when a distribution contains a lot of deviant outcomes or outliers. This is because the mean can be heavily influenced by extreme values, leading to a distorted representation of the data. Instead, the median is often a better measure in such cases, as it provides a more accurate reflection of the central tendency by being less affected by outliers.