How does beaver Ridge answer the charge that governing people without their consent is wrong?

Beaver Ridge addresses the charge that governing people without their consent is wrong by emphasizing the importance of social contracts and collective agreements. It argues that governance can be justified if it serves the common good and protects the rights of individuals, even if not everyone explicitly consents. Additionally, Beaver Ridge might suggest that the legitimacy of authority can stem from democratic processes or the general will of the community, thereby mitigating the issue of consent through representation and participation. Ultimately, it posits that effective governance prioritizes the welfare of the populace, which can validate the exercise of authority.