Why do we still recongnize people such as Dalton who have been proven wrong?

We continue to recognize figures like John Dalton because their contributions laid foundational frameworks for future discoveries, despite some inaccuracies in their theories. Dalton's work in atomic theory, for instance, was crucial in advancing our understanding of chemistry and matter. Acknowledging their contributions allows us to appreciate the evolution of scientific knowledge, where even flawed ideas can spur further inquiry and refinement. This historical context highlights the iterative nature of science and the importance of building on past work.