What is the difference between a genuine argument and a pseudo argument?

a genuine argument aims at persuading an audience into supporting a point of view. hence it makes use of the necessary procedures as well as processes to achieve this aim. these processes include toulmin schema use of rhetorical appeals and adopting the right structure of an argument -stating a claim, giving evidence, refuting the opposition and finally reaffirming the claim. at the end of it all, a conclusion is known as to whether this claim is the best or not. a pseudo argument on the other hand provides no room for drawing a conclusion concerning a claim expecially when it has got to do with fanatical believers and fanatical skeptics. with this, it's either the claim of one person is accepted whether it is the best or not or the argument continues into a baseless issue