How do nominal and contemptuous damages differ from one another?

Nominal damages are awarded to recognize a legal right that has been violated, even if no actual harm or financial loss occurred, typically involving a small, symbolic amount. Contemptuous damages, on the other hand, are granted when a court acknowledges that a legal right has been violated but believes the plaintiff does not deserve any substantial compensation due to their conduct or circumstances, often reflecting the court's disdain for the plaintiff's claim. Essentially, nominal damages affirm a right, while contemptuous damages convey the court's disapproval of the plaintiff's situation.