How do Rawls and Nozick compare and contrast in their theories of justice?

Rawls and Nozick both address the concept of justice, but they have different perspectives. Rawls focuses on distributive justice and the fair distribution of resources to benefit the least advantaged in society. Nozick, on the other hand, emphasizes individual rights and the importance of respecting property rights. While Rawls advocates for a more egalitarian society through redistribution, Nozick argues for minimal government intervention to protect individual liberties and property rights.