Why wouldn't we sift for 17s on a 200 board?

Sifting for 17s on a 200 board would be impractical because the number of combinations and potential outcomes is significantly larger, making it time-consuming and resource-intensive. Additionally, the odds of obtaining a 17 are lower compared to smaller boards, which diminishes the efficiency of the search. Finally, the focus could be better directed toward more likely outcomes or strategies that yield greater returns.