How do black elk and president Benjamin Harrison each view the cause of the wounded knee conflict?

Black Elk viewed the Wounded Knee conflict as a tragic culmination of the oppression faced by Native Americans, highlighting the spiritual and cultural devastation inflicted by U.S. policies. In contrast, President Benjamin Harrison and his administration saw the conflict through a lens of Law and Order, viewing it as a necessary action to quell unrest among Native Americans and maintain control over the frontier. While Black Elk emphasized the deep-rooted injustices and loss of identity, Harrison focused on the need for government authority and the preservation of peace. This fundamental difference in perspective underscores the broader clash between indigenous experiences and colonial governance.