What are the differences between pseudoscience and real science?

Pseudoscience lacks the rigorous methodology and empirical validation that characterize real science, often relying on anecdotal evidence rather than systematic experimentation. While real science is open to falsification and peer review, pseudoscience tends to resist criticism and does not adapt based on new evidence. Additionally, real science seeks to build a coherent body of knowledge that evolves over time, whereas pseudoscience often relies on fixed beliefs and lacks a theoretical foundation. Ultimately, the distinction lies in the commitment to evidence-based inquiry and the scientific method.