Why would demanding that Indians own private property make them more vulnerable to loosing their land than if they owned the land in common?

Demanding that Indians own private property can make them more vulnerable to losing their land because private ownership often leads to individual economic pressures, such as debt or the need for cash, which can compel individuals to sell their land. In contrast, communal land ownership typically fosters collective decision-making and solidarity, making it harder for external entities to encroach upon or acquire land. Additionally, private property can expose individuals to legal complexities and vulnerabilities in a system that may not adequately protect their rights. Thus, communal ownership can serve as a buffer against exploitation and displacement.