How did the strict constructionist view the elastic clause?

Strict constructionists view the elastic clause, or the Necessary and Proper Clause, with skepticism, believing that it should be interpreted narrowly. They argue that the federal government should only exercise powers explicitly granted by the Constitution, avoiding any expansion of federal authority through broad interpretations of the elastic clause. This perspective emphasizes a limited government and a strict adherence to the Constitution's text to prevent overreach. Consequently, strict constructionists advocate for a clear distinction between state and federal powers, ensuring states retain significant authority.