Why did Stalinist social coercion differ from Leninist social coercion?

Stalinist social coercion differed from Leninist social coercion primarily in its scale and intensity. While Lenin focused on consolidating power through a combination of revolutionary zeal and the suppression of opposition, Stalin escalated these tactics into a pervasive system of terror, including widespread purges, forced labor camps, and state-sponsored violence, to enforce conformity and eliminate perceived threats. Additionally, Stalin's regime emphasized a cult of personality and sought to reshape society through radical policies like collectivization, leading to greater societal disruption compared to Lenin's more pragmatic approach. Ultimately, Stalin's methods were characterized by a more systematic and brutal application of coercion, reflecting his totalitarian ambitions.