What argument could be made against Tanaka and justification for expansion What arguments against Hitler and?

Arguments against Tanaka's expansionist policies could include the potential for destabilizing regional peace and provoking international conflict, as well as the ethical implications of Imperialism. Critics might assert that such expansion could lead to economic strain and military overreach, ultimately harming Japan’s own interests. In contrast, arguments against Hitler often focus on the moral atrocities committed under his regime, the aggressive militarism that initiated World War II, and the severe consequences of his expansionist ambitions, which resulted in widespread devastation and loss of life across Europe. Both cases highlight the dangers of unchecked nationalism and the pursuit of territorial ambitions at the expense of human rights and global stability.