Why is the takings clause cited in arguments against environmental regulations that restrict the use of private property?

The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment states that private property cannot be taken for public use without just compensation. Opponents of environmental regulations argue that such restrictions effectively diminish property value or limit its use, constituting a "taking." They contend that property owners should be compensated for these lost rights, as the regulations can impose significant economic burdens. Consequently, the Takings Clause is often invoked in legal challenges against regulatory measures perceived to infringe on property rights.