Is there any evidence accepted by the majority of eminent Historians Scholars and Archaeologists that the Exodus actually happened?

Other answers from our community:

The short answer to this question is 'No'. Why? - They don't WANT to.

Since the majority of eminent historians, scholars, etc are not Christian they cannot be expected to find evidence to support their non-belief; since this majority of eminent historians, scholars, etc don't believe The Bible, they cannot be expected to find evidence to support the Bible; and facts are massaged to fit , and if they don't fit they are ignored.

(For example, they do not believe the original archaeological findings of the 'dig' at the site of ancient Jericho that the walls did fall down flat , that there was one section that didn't, and that it occurred at such-and-such a time. It was re-dated and 'spin-doctored' into a later date and there was no possible correlation with the Biblical facts.)

To answer the question, 'Yes, there is factual evidence that the Exodus occurred, but it is not accepted by the majority ( and especially among the christians) to avoid rocking the boat and having to accept that the Bible just might be true.'

Yes, there is plenty of evidence.

They look in the wrong time-frame for the Exodus event and so fail to find the evidence which is there. the Bible clearly indicates around 1440 BC for the Exodus (based on 1 Kings 6:1) with a conquest around 1400 BC. Yet most scholars look around 1230-50 BC and so find no evidence since the few cities that were destroyed (after all, they did want to live in them if they could) are no longer there to be found. The key Words here are "majority of eminent..."

The answer to hour question is; there's no evidence accepted by majority of eminent (etc) that the Exodus actually happened.