Would Hindman and Smith consider erbes argument relativist or universalist?

Hindman and Smith would likely consider Erbes' argument to be relativist, as it emphasizes the importance of context and individual perspectives in understanding truth and values. Relativism typically suggests that beliefs and moral judgments are shaped by cultural or situational factors, contrasting with universalism, which advocates for objective truths applicable across different contexts. If Erbes focuses on varying interpretations influenced by different backgrounds, it aligns more closely with relativist thinking.