What is one way to predict an earthquake?

yes

Yes it is.In fact as already available(see,O.P.Misra,J.L.Lavoine(North Holland,1986,p.82)and Misra(2002,Chapt.7)the correct Definition & Structure of Function in the sense of Logic of American Logician Alonzo Church. The answer is Schwartz Distribution & Its Value About A Point(Schwartz Distribution acts globally and not point by point),the measurement taken on Instruments can be errors free. Present Science & Technology are Statistical due to deficiencies in Definition & Structure of Function y=fX). Thereby, we can not forecast any of the Disasters properly. As stated Schwartz Distribution & Its Value About A point do not require Statistics nor Probability.Why Forecasting is not possible? the reason may be Scientists would have to learn 20th centuriy inventions based on 20th century mathematics. This is fact that present system of Science & Technology based on 17th century calculus its essence of the system would disappear. Thereby, Scientists do not want to take/learn latest inventions of 20th century. Therefore, any disaster such as Climate Changes/Earth quakes can not/would not be predicted till Scientists do not adopt new inventions as mentioned. First of all International Union of Mathematics/International Congress of Mathematicians had published about Schwartz's Prize to be awarded at "Oslo" and it has been published on P.1, of Professor Laurent Schwartz,google.com but now a days it has come on p.5. Can one can believe on such persons those who have not respect to the truth of American Logician Alonzo Church Logic And Schwartz work? These can be hindrance in the forecasting of Disasters as mentioned. If Such Spam would be continued in Science & Technology how the progress may be possible?