Should the debates that took place between the framers been conducted in secret?

The debates among the framers of the U.S. Constitution were conducted in secret to encourage open and honest discussion, free from public pressure and scrutiny. This confidentiality allowed them to explore controversial ideas and negotiate compromises without the fear of immediate backlash. However, some argue that transparency in such foundational discussions could have fostered greater public trust and understanding of the Constitution's principles. Ultimately, the secrecy was a pragmatic choice that enabled productive dialogue, but it also meant that the process was less accessible to the public.